‎27-11-2012 12:06 PM
Hello,
How to disable the namespacing between the object constraint and package (Package Owned Element/Package)? and between constraint and operation (OwnerOperation/ownedConstrained)
The constraint name is namespaced with the package name or the operation name...
there is a difference between MEGA 2009 SP4 CP12 and MEGA 2009 SP5 CP7.
We have a case 0029077 in support for the MACIF company.
Regards,
Patrick
Solved! Go to Solution.
‎04-12-2012 01:06 PM
Hello
Such changes are a consequence of metamodel evolutions for UML 2.0.
No change is planed regading this metamodele in MEGA 2009 SP5.
If you do not want a default owner in such cases, you can use a command file to customize standard metamodel.
See http://community.mega.com/t5/custom/page/page-id/mega-kb-solution?sid=501D00000011cM5IAI
‎27-11-2012 02:51 PM
Hello Mr Horber,
What is le server name?
‎27-11-2012 02:35 PM
Hello Patrick
1) The MetaClass Contraint was already namespaced in MEGA 2009 SP4.
A contraint object could be namespace by library object (livrary is a possible 'owner').
2) What has changed is that with MEGA 2009 SP5, a default owner is more often proposed.
Example: if a constraint is created from a package, this package is proposed as a default owner.
3) MEGA does not recommend to disable the namespace.
It creates a delta with the MEGA standard metamodel
+ It requires to change the metamodel regarding the name calculation (server name)
+ It requires to reprocess contraints to match the new server name