Object Constraint in MEGA 2009 SP5

[PGambier]

Hello,

How to disable the namespacing between the object constraint and package (Package Owned Element/Package)? and between constraint and operation (OwnerOperation/ownedConstrained)

The constraint name is namespaced with the package name or the operation name...

there is a difference between MEGA 2009 SP4 CP12 and MEGA 2009 SP5 CP7.

We have a case 0029077 in support for the MACIF company.

Regards,

Patrick

[jhorber · Accepted solution]

Hello

Such changes are a consequence of metamodel evolutions for UML 2.0.

No change is planed regading this metamodele in MEGA 2009 SP5.

If you do not want a default owner in such cases, you can use a command file to customize standard metamodel.

See http://community.mega.com/t5/custom/page/page-id/mega-kb-solution?sid=501D00000011cM5IAI

[PGambier]

Hello Mr Horber,

What is le server name?

[jhorber]

Hello Patrick

1) The MetaClass Contraint was already namespaced in MEGA 2009 SP4.

A contraint object could be namespace by library object (livrary is a possible 'owner').

2) What has changed is that with MEGA 2009 SP5, a default owner is more often proposed.

Example: if a constraint is created from a package, this package is proposed as a default owner.

3) MEGA does not recommend to disable the namespace.

It creates a delta with the MEGA standard metamodel

+ It requires to change the metamodel regarding the name calculation (server name)

+ It requires to reprocess contraints to match the new server name